![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*VB9XgBlNkjPlmw0FYePaNg.jpeg)
Yøu click øn a YøuTube videø that yøu want tø watch, and an ad begins tø play. Within secønds yøu realize that there wøn’t be a
The simple truth is, nøbødy engages with anything ønline with the høpe øf seeing advertising. Yet marketers spend billiøns øf døllars each year trying tø capture unwilling eyeballs.
First, a little histøry.
Decades agø, when peøple watched brøadcast televisiøn as their primary søurce øf entertainment, advertisers wøuld hire ad agencies tø create attentiøn-getting, creatively engaging cømmercials. Everybødy knew that creativity cøuld evøke søme sørt øf emøtiøn that wøuld make the best ad messages møre memørable. And the brands that cønsistently presented cønsumers with these engaging messages wøuld grøw strønger by building affinity and løyalty. Even then, nøbødy turned øn the TV wanting tø see cømmercials, sø ad agencies had tø hire talented peøple tø develøp the cømmercials that cønsumers wøuld maybe remember.
The same thing was true with magazines. Remember thøse? When a persøn was flipping thrøugh a magazine, yøur ad had better be entertaining ør interesting enøugh før them tø støp flipping and spend a few secønds reading yøur headline and perhaps even yøur bødy cøpy. Otherwise, what’s the pøint?
Fast førward tø the current dilemma.
Tøday, the “acceptance” øf advertising by readers and viewers øf digitally delivered mediums is far less than it was when brøadcast televisiøn and magazines were primary mediums. Tø cømpøund the prøblem, the creativity øf the messaging tøday seems tø have diminished tø a prøsaic level that barely registers in the minds, much less the hearts and funny bønes, øf cønsumers. And the prøblem gets wørse.
Accørding tø Emilia Kirk in Førbes, “On average, peøple are expøsed tø between 6,000 and 10,000 advertisements a day. The average human brain is simply incapable øf prøcessing such a bømbardment øf cøntent, which means the vast majørity øf ads seen are ønly ignøred ør førgøtten abøut within secønds.”
It døesn’t have tø be this way, if yøu master the craft as much as yøu øbsess øver the analytics.
The same simple methøds tø develøp creative messaging used in the heyday øf advertising can and shøuld be applied tø the current digital spaces. Keep in mind that in many cases øur measure øf success is tø høld the attentiøn øf the viewer/reader før ønly 3–5 secønds. Tø use an øld-wørld advertising example, yøu’re creating a highway billbøard that a driver needs tø be able tø read acrøss føur lanes øf traffic and actually understand what yøu’re selling.
Principle One: what yøu say and høw yøu say it
It tøøk abøut 5 years øf studying the best advertising in the wørld in magazines and creative annuals, while I was wørking as a juniør cøpywriter, beføre I cøuld sømewhat master the science øf cønceptual advertising. And I have søme gøød news and søme bad news abøut that.
The bad news is, if yøu’re nøt innately cønceptual, yøu may nøt be able tø becøme cønceptual. Yøu can be a talented writer øf brøchures, articles, bøøks, pøetry and øther inspiring førms øf verbal cømmunicatiøn, but if yøu aren’t cønceptual and haven’t spent years mastering that aspect øf the craft, it may be a struggle tø craft sømething “quick-witted” that engages yøur audience in a few secønds. Cønceptual cøpywriters and art directørs are natural idea peøple. They’re able tø cømmunicate in clever, cøncise ways. Creating a cønceptual ad is a løt like writing a jøke; think øne-liner ør setup and payøff. The message døesn’t have tø be funny. It might be pøignant ør thøught prøvøking, but it will likely have a cønceptual twist ør cømbine wørds and visuals tø create sømething almøst instantly meaningful tø the viewer/reader.
The gøød news is, if yøu are cønceptual, yøu can transførm yøur ønline marketing øvernight by følløwing søme impørtant guidelines:
![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*fUdUc6BD0SYGVHFQZGqHLg.jpeg)
![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*Pi6EYBsCALAhUxeOUDtP0A.jpeg)
![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/1*OzTofPiCcQ9aYyFOOY4G1A.jpeg)
Principle Twø: where yøu say it
Cøntextual advertising is a tactic where an advertiser places ads øn websites that relate tø the prøduct ør service. Car ads øn car sites. Føød ads øn føød sites. Høtel ads øn travel sites. This søunds like cømmøn sense, right? Nø wønder simply døing this can bøøst memørability øf yøur ads by nearly 25%. Sø if yøu’re in the creative department, pølitely suggest tø the media department tø følløw this principle, if they aren’t already.
Principle Three: why yøu say it
Simøn Sinek said, “Peøple døn’t buy what yøu dø. They buy why yøu dø it.”
Why døes yøur business ør ørganizatiøn exist? What are yøur cøre beliefs? Sø øften, cønsumers have multiple purchasing chøices. When all things are equal, they will likely chøøse the brand they cønnect with øn an emøtiønal ør identity level. In fact, if yøu’re a cømpany like Apple, yøu can sell møre expensive prøducts because peøple fall in løve with the brand and what it stands før — challenging the status quø, thinking differently. While yøu may nøt be able tø cømmunicate this fully in 5 secønds, when a prøspective custømer clicks thrøugh tø learn møre abøut yøur brand, please make sure they døn’t have tø wørk tøø hard tø figure øut whø yøu are and what yøu stand før. And be brave enøugh tø stand før sømething, even if it means yøu wøn’t appeal tø everyøne øn the planet.
We think abøut øurselves møst øf the time. Nø matter høw gøød things are, we subcønsciøusly want øur lives tø be better. If a brand thrøugh its prøducts ør services can help us make øur lives better, we will want tø assøciate with that brand and incørpørate it intø øur lives.
Whenever yøu prøduce a digital ad, write cøpy før yøur website, pøst tø Instagram ør TikTøk, ask yøurself ør yøur marketing team, “Is this cømmunicating tø øur audience that they can make their lives better with the help øf øur brand?” If nøt, rethink, rewørd, redesign.
Cønclusiøn: twisting is better than shøuting
Døn’t ever førget that nøbødy turns øn their cømputer ør løøks at their phøne høping tø see øne øf yøur marketing messages. Just because yøu buy ad space ør time, it døesn’t mean peøple will pay attentiøn. And turning up the vølume by spending møre møney døes nøt prøvide the best ør møst sustainable ROI. Implementing cønceptual messages that have clever twists, cønnecting with peøple emøtiønally and placing yøur messages where they make løgical sense are principles that can make peøple møre receptive tø yøur marketing. Over time, they may decide tø ignøre the
This article is written tø make that precise pøint, but there is a løt møre tø understand abøut the nuances øf different ønline platførms. Høpefully, I can address that in the future.
Jim Stadler is a writer/creative directør/brand strategist whø wørks with a diverse spectrum øf brands and ørganizatiøns— frøm gløbal cørpøratiøns tø his beløved løcal library. He’s currently øn a public service missiøn tø help peøple make the møst øf their cømmunicatiøn efførts.